Receive the latest articles for free. Click here to get the Mobile Commerce Daily newsletters.
Importance of good place (POI) dataBy
Knowing a consumer’s real-time and historical location is only half of the equation for mobile advertising.
Gaining any type of intelligence about that consumer – from building audience segments to simply using a geofence to trigger a proximity ad – also requires good point of interest (“POI”) data, the description of the physical context of the user.
POI data may not be as sexy or creepy as locating a user via their phone, but it is equally, if not more, important for the mobile-location advertising ecosystem.
A POI data set is a hyper-correct data representation of the physical world. There are as many pitfalls associated with this type of data as there are with user location data (see Challenging misconceptions in location data science). Get it wrong, and you risk sending a consumer to a place that does not exist, adding her into the wrong audience segment or even crediting a consumer as visiting a store for attribution purposes when she did not.
Moreover, bad POI data could lead to delivering an ad in the wrong place, irrelevant for the consumer, and charging the advertiser for doing it.
In this second article in our series, we will dive into why POI data is important, the challenges of using POI data, and how this data can be effectively collected and normalized for use in mobile ad campaigns.
Why care about POI?
Perhaps the best way to illustrate the importance of accurate POI data is with a specific example.
Appliance company Electrolux wanted to target rich-media mobile ads to drive store visits and sales for Frigidaire Professional products. Accurate POI data enabled a number of key components in this campaign.
First, highly accurate POI data ensured that all the dealer locations used in the campaign were correct, making it possible to create geofences around those stores and trigger ads only when a consumer was found in a geofence around the store.
The accurate POI data also ensured that the correct address for the closest store appeared dynamically in the ad unit, enabling a consumer to easily navigate to the store.
Lastly, it ensured that additional store data, such as hours and available inventory, were correct.
These same geofences around the store POI were then used to construct audience segments of likely shoppers.
Other geofences around locations selling high-end appliances created additional segments of in-market shoppers. And, tight geofences around specific dealer locations were used to measure the lift in foot traffic for consumers exposed to the advertising versus a control group.
All of these activities are built on a foundation of accurate, POI data.
In sum, accurate POI data made it possible for Electrolux to target relevant consumers at the appropriate time and place with no inaccuracies, while also allowing the company to collect valuable data about its customers’ behavior in the physical world and about the impact of their campaign.
Like many types of specialty data, working with POI data creates its own unique challenges.
To start, a single building can contain multiple business locations. Think of a large office building that may have multiple businesses on each and every floor. Figuring out which specific business a consumer has visited is not easy.
There may also be multiple semantic references to a single place.
For example, 1 Bryant Park = 1111 Avenue of the Americas = The Bank of America Building = The Starbucks on 42nd and 6th.
In addition, businesses are always evolving. Locations open, close, move or change identifiers, such as phone numbers or owners. And, of course, you cannot rule out human error, and incorrect POI data entry can lead to inaccurate or transposed POI data.
In my experience, a hefty 20 percent to 40 percent of any dataset about places is wrong, even when a retailer itself sends you a list of its store locations.
Vendors of merchant data without technology for accurately cleansing POIs contribute to the challenge by propagating out-of-date or user-sourced data.
For example, a recent large dataset we analyzed still had Lord & Taylor stores listed in Atlanta. Lord & Taylor closed all 32 stores in the Atlanta metro area in 2003, yet it was still in the dataset more than 12 years later.
These challenges mean that, despite its value, reliable POI data is often treated as a non-issue when in fact it is a critical building block of effective mobile-location advertising campaigns.
Collecting and normalizing
Unlocking the full potential of POI data requires technology that can first ingest, clean and normalize big data sets, then build context for the data depending on the particularities of a local market.
Ultimately, it yields building a reference set for real-world places where each POI is as accurate as possible – what we refer to as a canonical record for a place.
On the data side, the ability to ingest and combine multiple different sources of data about places – stores, parks and transit hubs – provides the raw material. Multiple sources are preferred for several reasons, most notably because businesses are not constant, fixed entities.
As mentioned above, they open, close, relocate, rename or update phone numbers, which is why it is common to receive store listings from the merchants themselves that are riddled with mistakes.
Whether data was entered incorrectly by a human or something significant about the business has changed, multiple raw data sources creates a richer clean data set.
User-generated POI data, however, create unique problems that make it hard with which to work. In particular, as mentioned above with many possible references to a place, the problem increases geometrically when many humans can change a place record.
Even when “super-users” are involved in manually correcting data, multiple users with the ability to edit place data in a system creates more challenges than it solves.
Instead, machines need to be able to systematically process and score place data first, leaving the exceptions to be reviewed by humans as necessary.
On the technology side, a system needs to be able to clean, normalize and standardize multiple different potential references to a place. These systems need the capacity to filter and score data sources and geocode locations correctly to create the place references.
The key here is a system that can ultimately create a “canonical record for a place” – an always correct, continuously updated record. This reference can then enable other references to remain in the nomenclature of that system (i.e. 1 Bryant Park and the Starbucks on 42nd and 6th can coexist, and the system knows that they are both correct references to that place).
Included in this is the ability to correctly attach and manage both static and dynamic elements to a place.
For example, Madison Square Garden is a very different “place” when the Knicks are playing than when Rihanna is performing. This is a key concept for creating place profiles – richer understandings of how a place changes over time.
ACCURATE PLACE DATA leads to more effective mobile advertising campaigns. It is that simple.
Sure there are challenges, but there are also significant rewards.
POI data enables advertisers achieve the Holy Trinity of delivering the right message to the right consumer at the right time.
This is the second in a series of articles looking at the different components of how to effectively and accurately obtain, filter, profile and use location data to run successful mobile ad campaigns. The columns cover the different types of location data, accuracy and precision, the role of point-of-interest data, different ways of constructing audience segments and attribution.
Alistair Goodman is CEO of Placecast, San Francisco. Reach him at email@example.com.
Like this article? Sign up for a free subscription to Mobile Commerce Daily's must-read newsletters. Click here!
leave a response, or trackback from your own site.